nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2014, 03, v.42;No.197 90-92
影响基层医院急性心肌梗死患者静脉溶栓效果的多因素Logistic回归分析
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2014-06-15
出版时间: 2014-06-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

目的:探讨影响基层医院急性心肌梗死(acute myocardial infarction,AMI)患者静脉溶栓效果的相关因素,通过Logistic回归分析,探究相关的危险性因素,为临床治疗策略的制定提供依据。方法:回顾分析2012年1月-2013年12月本院心血管内科住院使用尿激酶溶栓的AMI患者86例,根据患者溶栓治疗后血管是否开通分为开通组47例和未开通组39例,比较两组的一般临床资料。以血管是否开通为因变量,对可能的相关影响因素包括BMI、溶栓时间、糖尿病、不稳定型心绞痛、吸烟以及前壁相关性心肌梗死进行Logistic回归分析。确定相应的危险因素。结果:86例AMI溶栓患者中,47例血管成功开通。开通组和未开通组比较。前者的BMI较大、溶栓时间较短、糖尿病患病率较低、不稳定型心绞痛发生率较低、吸烟比例较高以及前壁相关性心肌梗死的比例较高。Logistic回归分析的结果发现溶栓时间>5h、糖尿病、不稳定型心绞痛、非前壁相关性心肌梗死等4个因素均为血管开通失败的危险因素。结论:基层医院接诊的AMI患者若合并糖尿病、既往有不稳定型心绞痛、溶栓时间>5 h或心肌梗死部位为非前壁相关性心梗时.建议尽早转运至上级医院介入中心处理。

Abstract:

Objective:To investigate the related factors that affect intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction(acute myocardial infarction,AMI) patients by multivariate Logistic regression analysis.Methods:86 AMI patients in our cardiology department between January 2012 to December 2013 were included.Based on intravenous thrombolysis result,they were divided into open group(39 cases) or un-open group(47cases).Their clinical data were retrospective analyzed.The opening situation was considered as dependent variable and possible related factors including BMI,thrombolysis time,diabetes,unstable angina,smoking,and anterior myocardial infarction associated were considered as independent variables.Results:compared the open group and un- open group,the former group was with greater BMI,shorter thrombolysis time,lower diabetes incidence and unstable angina,higher smoking incidence and anterior myocardial infarction.Multivariate Logistic regression analysis results showed that thrombolysis time > 5h,diabetes,unstable angina,non-anterior myocardial infarction were risk factors of open failure.Conclusion:AMI patients with diabetes,unstable angina history,thrombolysis time>5 h or non-anterior myocardial infarction admitted in primary hospital were better transported to senior hospital.

参考文献

[1]Lonborg J,Vejlstrup N,Kelbaek H,et al.Impact of acute hyperglycemia on myocardial infarct size,area at risk and salvage in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and the association with exenatide treatment-results from a randomized study[J].Diabetes,2014.

[2]Kristensen S D,Laut K G,Fajadet J,et al.Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011:current status in 37 ESC countries[J].Eur Heart J,2014.

[3]高润霖.从急性心肌梗死治疗指南看再灌注治疗策略的选择[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(11):1061-1064.

[4]Widimsky P,Coram R,Abou-Chebl A.Reperfusion therapy of acute ischaemic stroke and acute myocardial infarction:similarities and differences[J].Eur Heart J,2014,35(3):147-155.

[5]刘勇,刘艳丽,周永立,等.基层医院尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死128例临床观察[J].岭南心血管病杂志,2011,17(3):218-220.

[6]王雄心.急性心肌梗死在基层医院的救治体会[J].临床急诊杂志,2009,10(2):98-99.

[7]王建军,李志民,方洁.急诊应用瑞替普酶尿激酶对急性心肌梗死溶栓的随机对照研究[J].中国急救医学,2012,32(5):455-457.

[8]付世全,王莉莎,张玉.尿激酶静脉溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死86例临床分析[J].重庆医学,2010,39(20):2757-2758.

[9]叶君明,黄文军.急性心肌梗死静脉溶栓应用瑞替普酶及尿激酶治疗的临床研究[J].中国医药,2011,06(2):155-156.

[10]熊国华.尿激酶治疗早期急性心肌梗死的临床效果[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2010,9(11):842-843.

[11]胡彬.阿替普酶与尿激酶溶栓治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效对比分析[J].实用药物与临床,2013,16(10):960-962.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R542.22

引用信息:

[1]黄伟胜,罗森华,李文婷,等.影响基层医院急性心肌梗死患者静脉溶栓效果的多因素Logistic回归分析[J].广州医学院学报,2014,42(03):90-92.

发布时间:

2014-06-15

出版时间:

2014-06-15

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文