| 18 | 4 | 63 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:观察腹腔镜卵巢肿瘤剔除术不同止血方式的临床效果。方法:纳入2013年12月至2017年12月中山市黄圃人民医院收治的152例行腹腔镜卵巢肿瘤剔除术的患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为缝合组(缝合止血)和电凝组(电凝止血),每组各76例。观察两组患者手术情况、并发症情况、月经和排卵情况及卵巢激素水平情况。结果:两组手术时间、出血量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。缝合组、电凝组并发症发生率均为1.32%,两组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。缝合组排卵异常、经期延长及经量过少情况均低于电凝组(P<0.05)。治疗后,缝合组FSH、LH及E2水平均优于电凝组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜卵巢肿瘤剔除术术中缝合止血对患者卵巢性激素水平影响较小,更大程度保护卵巢功能,值得临床应用及推广。
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the clinical effects of different hemostasis methods for laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.Methods:A total of 152 patients who underwent laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in the Huangpu People's Hospital of Zhongshan City between December 2013 and December 2017 were included as the subjects in the study.All patients were randomly divided into the suture group(suture hemostasis) and electrocoagulation group(electrocoagulation hemostasis)(n=76 each).The operation,complications,menstruation,ovulation and ovarian hormone levels were determined in the two groups.Results:There were statistically significant differences in the operation time and blood loss between the two groups(P>0.05).The incidence of complications in the suture group and the electrocoagulation group was both 1.32%,without statistically significant difference(P>0.05).The complication rates of abnormal ovulation,prolonged menstruation,and hypomenorrhea in the suture group were lower than those in the electrocoagulation group(P<0.05).After the treatment,the FSH,LH and E2 levels in the suture group were better than those in the electrocoagulation group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Suture hemostasis in laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy shows fewer disturbance on ovarian hormone levels and more protection for ovarian function,which justifies widespread use in the clinical settings.
[1]王俊芳,张琴,逯霞,等.腹腔镜卵巢良性肿瘤剔除术术中止血方式对女性月经及性激素水平的影响[J].中国基层医药,2014,21(18):2816-2818.
[2]李日红,陈光元,黄平,等.腹腔镜下卵巢囊肿剔除术中不同止血方法对卵巢功能近期与远期的影响[J].海南医学,2016,27(20):3347-3349.
[3]Perlman S,Kjer J J.Ovarian damage due to cyst removal:a comparison of endometriomas and dermoid cysts[J].Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2016,95(3):285-290.
[4]邢磊.腹腔镜卵巢良性肿瘤剔除术中不同止血方式对女性月经及性激素水平的影响[J].中国现代医生,2015,53(9):29-31.
[5]钟艺华,王小丽.腹腔镜下卵巢囊肿剥除术不同止血方式对残留卵巢功能的影响[J].四川医学,2014,35(2):211-213.
[6]Sarmadi S,Ahmadi FS,Ejtemaei Mehr S,et al.Histopathologic and sonographic analysis of laparoscopic removal ovarian nonendometriotic cyst:the evaluating effects on ovarian reserve[J].Acta Med Iran,2014,52(5):341-344.
[7]温勇.腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤剥除术中缝合止血与电凝止血效果对比分析[J].河南医学研究,2016,25(2):281-281.
[8]吴燕祯,秦福杰,李玉香,等.腹腔镜下卵巢囊肿剥除创面双极电凝止血与缝合止血对卵巢功能影响[J].中国医刊,2015,50(4):66-69.
[9]尹龙燕,任丽华,崔嗣庚,等.腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤剥除术中不同止血法的术后卵巢功能比较[J].中国现代医生,2014,52(34):11-13.
[10]张静,李凤文.4种止血方式在腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤剥除术后对卵巢功能的影响分析[J].河北医科大学学报,2014,35(6):645-649.
[11]Bhat RG,Dhulked S,Ramachandran A et al.Laparoscopic cystectomy of endometrioma:good surgical technique does not adversely affect ovarian reserve[J].J Hum Reprod Sci,2014,7(2):125-129.
[12]李艳,凡利俊.腹腔镜行卵巢肿瘤剥除术后缝合止血与电凝止血的比较[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(16):3410-3411.
[13]Ulubay M,Keskin U,Fidan U,et al.A modified technique to reduce spillage and the operative time in laparoscopic dermoid cyst excision[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2015,25(2):143-146.
[14]赵嵩.腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤剔除后不同止血方式对卵巢功能的影响[J].中国伤残医学,2014,22(16):102-103.
[15]龙平,鄂立红,李维红,等.腹腔镜下卵巢肿瘤剥除术中缝合止血与电凝止血的对比分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(24):5509-5511.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R737.31
引用信息:
[1]梁苗芳.腹腔镜卵巢肿瘤剔除术不同止血方式的比较[J].广州医科大学学报,2018,46(03):62-64+68.