| 108 | 17 | 123 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
目的:探讨虚实结合挂线法对高位复杂性肛瘘患者术后创面愈合及肛门功能的影响。方法:选取2016年10月至2018年8月收治的75例高位复杂性肛瘘患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方法不同分为两组:对照组(30例)采用内口上方实挂线法治疗,观察组(45例)采用虚实结合挂线法治疗。比较两组治愈率、术后3个月复发率,瘢痕面积,创面愈合时间,术后大便失禁严重度评分表(Wexner),术后1、3、5、7 d视觉模拟评分(VAS)等指标。结果:观察组和对照组的治愈率、术后3个月复发率分别为97.78%、2.22%和100.00%、0,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组瘢痕面积、创面愈合时间、Wexner评分低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组术后1、3、5、7 d VAS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:虚实结合挂线法是治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的有效方法,能减轻术后疼痛,减少瘢痕面积,促进创面愈合,保护肛门功能,应用价值较高。
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effects of loose-and-tight thread-drawing therapy on wound healing and anal function in patients with high complex anal fistula. Methods: Seventy-five patients with high complex anal fistula admitted to our hospital between October 2016 and August 2018 were included in the study. According to different treatment methods,the patients were divided into two groups. The control group( n = 30) was treated with the traditional tight thread-ligating therapy. The study group( n = 45) was treated with loose-and-tight threaddrawing therapy. The cure rate,recurrence rate at 3 months after the operation,scar area,time to wound healing,postoperative fecal incontinence severity( Wexner) scores,and the visual analogue scale( VAS) scores at 1,3,5 and 7 d after the operation in the two groups was compared. Results: The cure rate and the recurrence rate at 3 months after the operation in the study group and control group were 97.78% vs. 100.00% and 2.22%vs. 0,respectively,with no statistically significant differences between the two groups( P>0.05). The scar area,time to wound healing,and Wexner scores in the study group were lower than those in the control group( P <0. 05). The VAS scores at 1,3,5 and 7 d after the operation in the study group were lower than those in the control group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion: Loose-and-tight thread-drawing therapy is an effective method for the treatment of high complex anal fistula. It may reduce postoperative pain,decrease scar area,promote wound healing,and protect anal function,with promising value for use in clinical setting.
[1]周明珠,邱光明,焦强.低位切除结合高位松挂线分次紧线术与低位切开高位挂线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效对比分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(11):1418-1420.
[2]丁曙晴,丁义江.肛周脓肿和肛瘘诊治策略———解读美国和德国指南[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(12):1224-1226.
[3]马木提江·阿巴拜克热,陈慧,刘学.橡皮筋挂线手术方法制备复杂性肛瘘大动物模型与评估[J].安徽医药,2017,21(03):458-461.
[4]马军,刘桂英,杨小勇,等.分析中药熏洗联合低位切开高位挂线法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,36(8):104-105.
[5]莫波,郝志楠,马娟,等.传统切开挂线疗法与瘘管旷置术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床研究[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(13):1809-1810.
[6]傅军伟,王明华,朱卫英.虚挂线结合拖线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床观察[J].中医药导报,2016,22(01):67-69.
[7]郑丽华,石玉迎,贾兰斯,等.应用虚实结合挂线法与传统实挂线法治疗高位肛瘘的临床观察[J].中华中医药杂志,2017,32(2):587-590.
[8]王业皇,王可为.丁泽民切开挂线疗法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘临证经验探析[J].江苏中医药,2015,47(2):1-4.
基本信息:
中图分类号:R657.16
引用信息:
[1]王洪保,何玉峰,张恩华.虚实结合挂线法对高位复杂性肛瘘创面愈合及肛门功能的影响[J].广州医科大学学报,2019,47(01):121-123+128.
2019-02-15
2019-02-15